RAResearchAudio

Reviewed repository / hardware evidence

KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev: GPU & VRAM requirements

KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev is reported as a 34.66 billion-parameter Qwen3.5 mixture-of-experts architecture derived from Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. The repository name signals a development-focused coding release, but the Hub trend, likes, and downloads are discovery signals rather than an evaluation. The immediate hardware question is whether INT4 can stay on one 24 GB card.

See the precision plan → Inspect the source repository →

Decision summary

Where the memory boundary actually lands.

The INT4 weight-plus-20%-headroom floor is 19.37 GiB. A 24 GB card with a 90% usable budget exposes 21.6 GiB, leaving roughly 2.23 GiB before the cache and runtime costs excluded by the model. That is a plausible first experiment, not a blanket fit guarantee. INT8 first clears the 48 GB tier, while BF16 first clears 96 GB.

Why this page exists. The page resolves a high-value 24 GB boundary with source-specific arithmetic and keeps that decision separate from the broader Qwen3 family guide, which covers different released parameter tiers and architectures.

Weights first / precision by precision

The reproducible memory floor.

Every row uses 34.66B parameters × bits ÷ 8 ÷ 1024³, then adds 20% planning headroom. The single-card tier assumes 90% of labeled VRAM is available.

ModeBitsRaw weights+ 20% floorFirst single-card tier24 GB GPU count*Calculator
INT4 4 bits 16.14 GiB 19.37 GiB 24 GB 1 Edit plan →
INT8 8 bits 32.28 GiB 38.74 GiB 48 GB 2 Edit plan →
BF16 16 bits 64.56 GiB 77.47 GiB 96 GB 4 Edit plan →

*GPU count is capacity division against 90% usable VRAM. It does not prove the runtime can shard the model, avoid replication, or deliver acceptable interconnect performance.

INT4 card-fit matrix

Test the floor against common memory tiers.

Positive margin means the INT4 weight-plus-headroom floor fits inside the declared usable budget. It is not leftover context capacity: cache, runtime workspace, and system allocations are still unknown.

Card memory90% usableOne-card resultCapacity-only count
8 GB 7.2 GiB Short by 12.17 GiB 3
12 GB 10.8 GiB Short by 8.57 GiB 2
16 GB 14.4 GiB Short by 4.97 GiB 2
24 GB 21.6 GiB Clears by 2.23 GiB 1
32 GB 28.8 GiB Clears by 9.43 GiB 1
48 GB 43.2 GiB Clears by 23.83 GiB 1
80 GB 72 GiB Clears by 52.63 GiB 1
96 GB 86.4 GiB Clears by 67.03 GiB 1
141 GB 126.9 GiB Clears by 107.5 GiB 1

Public source record

What the repository declares.

Metadata refreshed Aug 15, 2026. Open the source before relying on any field.

Open Kwaipilot/KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev →
Repository
Kwaipilot/KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev
Safetensors total
34.66B parameters
Architecture
Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration
Model type
qwen3_5_moe
Library
transformers
License metadata
apache-2.0
Access gated
No
Base model
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Languages
en, zh
Created
Jul 23, 2026
Last modified
Jul 28, 2026
Hub signal
23.4K downloads · 579 likes

Do not confuse capacity with deployment

Repository-specific caution.
Mixture-of-experts execution, tokenizer behavior, supported quantizations, and coding quality are outside this page's evidence. The reported total is useful for resident-weight planning, but it does not prove that a particular consumer runtime implements the Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration architecture or that a long context will fit the remaining memory.

Formula boundary.
No KV cache, activations, graph capture, allocator fragmentation, offload, operating-system reserve, throughput, latency, or power is included.

Source boundary.
Hub trend, downloads, and likes help discover repositories. They are not a benchmark, endorsement, security review, or license opinion.

Before downloading weights

Three checks specific to this repository.

  1. Verify that the selected runtime supports Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration and the repository's development checkpoint format.
  2. Add the intended code context length and concurrent sequences before trusting the approximately two-GiB margin on a 24 GB card.
  3. Evaluate coding quality with task-specific tests; neither the coder label nor Hub trend score supplies that evidence.

Passive backlink / model-card distribution

Let the repository carry its hardware evidence.

Add this passive SVG badge to a README, model card, documentation page, or benchmark report. It states the source-backed KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev INT4 floor and links to the assumptions—not to a download or quality claim.

Why this repository benefits. This badge fits a coding-model README or evaluation report because it anchors KAT-Coder's 24 GB workstation claim to a 19.37 GiB INT4 floor, while the destination preserves the missing context, runtime, and MoE-support checks.

KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev source-backed INT4 planning floor badge Badge visits use utm_source=model_badge, utm_medium=model_card, and this repository’s slug. Copying does not submit or store anything.

Nearest reviewed parameter totals

These pages use the same formula and source rules, making the capacity boundary comparable without pretending the models have equivalent quality or runtime behavior.

KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev FAQ

Three answers with the assumptions attached.

Use these as a first-pass hardware screen. Replace parameter arithmetic with exact artifact bytes and architecture-aware cache inputs before deployment.

Open the editable GPU calculator →

How much VRAM does KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev need?

KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev has 34.66 billion safetensors parameters in the public Hub metadata. The weight-plus-20%-headroom floors are 19.37 GiB at INT4, 38.74 GiB at INT8, and 77.47 GiB at BF16. These estimates exclude KV cache, activations, runtime workspace, fragmentation, offload, and speed.

Can KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev run on one GPU?

The first listed card tier whose 90%-usable budget clears the INT4 weight floor is 24 GB. That is an arithmetic starting point, not a runtime guarantee.

Does the Hugging Face signal prove KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev is good?

No. Downloads, likes, and trending position are discovery signals. They do not prove task quality, safety, speed, runtime compatibility, or licensing suitability.

Evidence before infrastructure

Get the next model decision brief.

ResearchAudio turns model releases, checkpoint claims, memory boundaries, and serving constraints into practical decisions for engineers and builders.