ResearchAudio

ResearchAudio evidence lab

Seventeen instruments for the decision behind the demo.

Check whether a task has an error signal, audit the benchmark and launch claim, size GPU and KV-cache memory, budget tokens, price voice outcomes and latency, calculate real operating cost, inspect the production loop, stress-test the business case, then configure the coding agent.

Join 51,000+ readers for the next evidence-led briefing → New here? Get the guided starter kit → Publish here? Embed a working calculator →
Instrument 01 / claim

AI launch evidence scorecard

Seven checks expose the gap between a launch claim and decision-ready proof.

Score a launch →
Instrument 02 / economics

Cost per successful task

Calculate the retry-adjusted cost after model calls and human review.

Calculate real cost →
Instrument 03 / reliability

Agent loop diagnostic

Find missing termination, validation, recovery, and escalation guardrails.

Inspect a loop →
Instrument 04 / business case

AI agent ROI stress test

Price failed automations, human review, recurring cost, and implementation payback.

Stress-test the ROI →
Instrument 05 / token budget

LLM API cost calculator

Estimate monthly spend from traffic, input and output tokens, current prices, prompt caching, retries, and attached tools.

Build a token budget →
Instrument 06 / cache economics

Prompt caching cost calculator

Model cache reads, cache writes, monthly savings, and the hit rate required to break even.

Find the break-even rate →
Instrument 07 / developer workflow

Codex CLI config.toml generator

Generate project document fallbacks and the instruction byte limit without displacing AGENTS.md.

Build the config →
Instrument 08 / conversational latency

Voice AI latency calculator

Budget endpointing, transcription, parallel fast and slow model branches, TTS, and playout.

Map the silence →
Instrument 09 / GPU fit

LLM GPU memory calculator

Estimate weight VRAM, inference headroom, usable capacity, and the minimum GPU count for a model.

Size the deployment →
Instrument 10 / inference cache

LLM KV cache calculator

Calculate cache memory per token, full-context sequence, concurrency level, and GQA/MHA architecture.

Size the cache →
Instrument 11 / voice economics

AI voice agent cost

Calculate loaded cost per AI-resolved call after the full voice stack, fixed fees, failures, and human handoffs.

Price the outcome →
Instrument 12 / benchmark protocol

AI benchmark audit

Check twelve protocol details behind a model, agent, or coding benchmark before trusting the score.

Audit the benchmark →
Instrument 13 / task framing

AI task-fit diagnostic

Check whether the workflow has a target, independent judge, timely error signal, bounded actions, and a human owner for premise changes.

Test the task fit →
Instrument 14 / Codex automation

Codex exec command builder

Generate a shell-safe command for JSONL events, ephemeral runs, sandboxing, structured output, and deliberate non-Git execution.

Build the command →
Instrument 15 / local inference

Local LLM GPU compatibility

Check 7B, 13B, 32B, and 70B weight floors against common 8 GB to 141 GB GPU profiles before adding context.

Check the hardware →
Instrument 16 / model discovery

What LLM can I run?

Start with 8 to 141 GB of VRAM and find the largest standard model-size floor it clears at INT4, INT8, or FP16.

Find the model tier →
Instrument 17 / source lookup

Hugging Face VRAM + badge

Paste a public model repository, calculate three source-backed weight floors, copy an attributed badge, then continue in the native Hugging Face Space or companion GitHub Action.

Inspect a repository →

Daily index + search field notes

Start with the simple metric. Finish with the system.

Primary-source worksheets turn security, voice-pricing, and GPU-sizing questions into explicit controls and assumptions.

Daily index / open-model discovery

Trending local LLM hardware index

Track twelve text-generation models moving on Hugging Face, with source-backed parameter counts and transparent INT4, INT8, and BF16 planning floors.

Inspect today’s model queue →
Reviewed cluster / repository-specific

Local LLM model hardware pages

Compare eight reviewed repositories with source-backed parameter totals, precision floors, card-fit matrices, architecture metadata, and editable GPU plans.

Browse the reviewed model pages →
Field guide / local LLM hardware

Local LLM GPU and VRAM requirements

Start from a model, a VRAM budget, a specific GPU, or a released checkpoint, then follow the evidence to an editable deployment plan.

Use the hardware decision guide →
Field note / formula

Voice AI cost per minute

Add the five usage meters, fixed fees, failed resolutions, and human handoffs before comparing stacks.

Read the formula →
Field note / worksheet

AI receptionist cost

Open editable after-hours, appointment-booking, and high-volume planning scenarios.

Use the worksheet →
Field note / GPU sizing

7B vs 13B LLM GPU requirements

Compare six weight and 32K-cache profiles, then see how GQA versus MHA changes the fit.

Compare the smaller models →
Field note / GPU sizing

70B LLM GPU requirements

Separate INT4, INT8, and FP16 weight floors from explicit 32K KV cache and runtime headroom.

Compare the scenarios →
Field note / 12 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 3060 12GB run?

Separate the generic 14B INT4 weight tier from exact Qwen3 and gpt-oss profiles once context memory is included.

Inspect the RTX 3060 boundary →
Field note / 8 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 4060 8GB run?

Follow Qwen3 8B from a comfortable 4K fit to the exact 16K and 32K context-memory boundaries.

Inspect the RTX 4060 boundary →
Field note / 16 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB run?

Verify the 16GB variant, then inspect the narrow Qwen3 14B and gpt-oss-20b planning fits.

Inspect the RTX 4060 Ti boundary →
Field note / 24 GB comparison

RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090 for local LLMs

See why both cards share the same one-card model ceiling, then separate capacity from measured runtime value.

Compare the 24 GB cards →
Field note / 24 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 4090 run?

Compare generic INT4, INT8, and FP16 tiers with exact Qwen3 and gpt-oss profiles near the 24 GB boundary.

Inspect the RTX 4090 boundary →
Field note / 8 GB vs 16 GB

RTX 5060 Ti 8GB vs 16GB for local LLMs

Compare exact Qwen3 and gpt-oss boundaries to see where the doubled VRAM changes the answer.

Compare the RTX 5060 Ti variants →
Field note / 12 GB vs 16 GB

RTX 4070 Super vs 4070 Ti Super for local LLMs

Map the extra 4GB to exact Qwen3 and gpt-oss outcomes before choosing between the two Ada cards.

Compare the RTX 4070 Super cards →
Field note / Apple unified memory

Mac mini M4 for local LLMs

Choose between 16GB, 24GB, 32GB, 48GB, and 64GB using a conservative shared-memory budget.

Choose the Mac mini memory tier →
Field note / 16 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 5080 run?

Inspect the razor-thin Qwen3 14B and short-context gpt-oss-20b paper fits before trusting a 16 GB deployment.

Inspect the RTX 5080 boundary →
Field note / 32 GB GPU

What LLM can an RTX 5090 run?

See where Qwen3 32B and a 128K gpt-oss-20b profile cross from a 24 GB near miss into a narrow 32 GB fit.

Inspect the RTX 5090 boundary →
Field note / model family

Qwen2.5 GPU requirements

Compare 7B, 32B, and 72B across INT4, INT8, BF16, exact 32K KV cache, and the 128K context jump.

Choose the checkpoint →
Field note / dense + MoE

Qwen3 GPU requirements

Compare 8B, 14B, 32B, and 30B-A3B across INT4, INT8, BF16, exact 32K cache, and Qwen's observed memory.

Size the Qwen3 family →
Field note / current model

DeepSeek V4 Flash GPU requirements

Start with the official 0731 release and its 155.43 GiB mixed-precision artifact, then compare 32K, 128K, 384K, and 1M context plans.

Size DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 →
Field note / current model

GLM-5.2 GPU requirements

Start with the official 703.74 GiB FP8 artifact, then compare the 8×80 GiB shortfall, 8×H200 baseline, 8×B200 full-context recipe, and BF16 floor.

Size GLM-5.2 FP8 →
Field note / current model

Kimi K3 GPU requirements

Start with the official 1,453.74 GiB MXFP4 artifact, then separate the 8×H200 shortfall, 12×H200 raw floor, and Moonshot's 64-plus-accelerator recommendation.

Size Kimi K3 →
Field note / current family

Gemma 4 GPU requirements

Compare Google's E2B, E4B, 12B, 26B A4B, and 31B loading estimates across BF16, SFP8, and Q4_0, then inspect the exact 12B files.

Size the Gemma 4 family →
Field note / current model

DiffusionGemma GPU requirements

Start with the exact 48.10 GiB BF16 and 17.53 GiB NVIDIA NVFP4 artifacts, then keep 256K context outside the weight-only claim.

Size DiffusionGemma →
Field note / open weights

gpt-oss hardware requirements

Compare the official 20B and 120B checkpoints, MXFP4 weight floor, 4K deployment budget, and 128K cache jump.

Size the OpenAI models →
Field note / agent security

AI agent security checklist

Test twelve controls for goal hijacking, tool permissions, isolation, secrets, audit trails, shutdown, and recovery.

Inspect the authority boundary →

Field guide / model economics

Keep frontier reasoning. Cut frontier typing.

The 10-page Fable 5 Cost Playbook turns model routing, effort, caching, context, batch execution, and spend caps into one practical checklist.

Free PDF · 10 pages · July 2026 archive Open the cost playbook → Includes a dated pricing snapshot; verify current rates before purchasing.

Lab protocol

Start with the decision.
A metric matters only if it changes what you do.

Name the hidden denominator.
Retries and failures belong in the result.

Leave with a next test.
Every score should create an inspection, not a vibe.

One teardown at a time

Get the evidence behind the next AI launch.

ResearchAudio traces primary sources, costs, limitations, and adoption questions for engineers and builders.